Skip to main content

Will Artificial Intelligence Destroy Mankind? Stephen Hawking Thinks It Could Happen

courtesy of freeimages.com


A recent Fox news article (read article here) reported that physicist Stephen Hawking is worried about the development of artificial intelligence, or AI for short.[1]  Hawking is apparently worried that if advances in AI continue the human race could one day become extinct.  He is quoted as saying, "The development of full artificial intelligence (AI) could spell the end of the human race."  The article also quotes Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla Motors.  Musk is said to have told an audience at MIT that we need to be "very careful" with artificial intelligence.  Fox reports that Musk "called for national and international oversight of the field".

The idea of machines becoming more advanced than humans is great science fiction.  It is fun and somewhat scary to contemplate the ramifications of machines being able to think for themselves.  But will AI be the end of mankind?  Not if you believe Bible prophecy.  Man will not be destroyed by machines, or nuclear holocaust, or plagues.  Man will continue until Christ returns and judges each human individual and assigns him his eternal destiny, Heaven or Hell.  So AI will not wipe out the human race.  Humans were made for eternity.  The redeemed will spend eternity in the presence of the Savior they trusted for salvation.  The condemned will spend eternity separated from the Savior they rejected.


ENDNOTES:

 [1] Tanya Lewis, Stephen Hawking: Artificial intelligence could end human race, December 3, 2014, http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/12/03/stephen-hawking-artificial-intelligence-could-end-human-race/  Accessed on December 3, 2014

Popular posts from this blog

Why Couldn't Esau Repent?

What a terrible thing to want to repent and not be allowed to.  Why would God withhold repentance from Esau who was obviously broken in spirit?  Unfortunately for Esau, that seems to be what Hebrews 12:17 is saying.  Here’s the verse in its immediate context: Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.  For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.  Heb. 12:15-17 (KJV) You are probably familiar with the story from Genesis chapter 25.  Esau, the firstborn, returns from an exhausting day in the field and is hungry.  He asks for some of Jacob’s stew and Jacob offers to sell a bowl of stew to Esau in exchange for Esau’s birthrigh...
Read more

The Lord's Supper and Eating Unworthily

By far the most popular passage in Baptist churches concerning observing the Lord's Supper is 1 Corinthians 11:17-34.  A particular focus has been placed on verses 27-31 quoted below from the King James Version that many of us grew up with. 27  Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28  But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. 29  For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. 30  For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. 31  For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. (1 Cor. 11:27-31 KJV) photo courtesy of www.freeimages.com Pastors often point to these verses as a warning to would be participants in the ordinance that they should first examine themselves so that they don't partake unworthily ...
Read more

Obama Makes Illogical Pro-abortion Arguments

On January 22, 2016, the 43rd anniversary of the horrible Roe v. Wade decision concerning abortion in America, President Obama made a statement advocating for abortion (click here to access statement) .  President Obama's statement reflects the standard talking points of pro-death abortion advocates.  Let's think through his statement line by line. First he says Roe v. Wade "affirmed a woman's freedom to make her own choices about her body and her health."  This is the "pro-choice" argument.  The problem is that it isn't logical.  No woman in America has complete freedom of choice when it comes to her own body or her own health.  For instance, there are laws against drug abuse.  A woman doesn't have the legal right to make her own choice about her body in this instance.  The law takes that choice away.  She is not allowed to abuse drugs simply because that's what she chooses to do with her body.  A second reason that this is illogical ...
Read more