Skip to main content

The Lord's Supper and Eating Unworthily

By far the most popular passage in Baptist churches concerning observing the Lord's Supper is 1 Corinthians 11:17-34.  A particular focus has been placed on verses 27-31 quoted below from the King James Version that many of us grew up with.
27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. (1 Cor. 11:27-31 KJV)
photo courtesy of www.freeimages.com

Pastors often point to these verses as a warning to would be participants in the ordinance that they should first examine themselves so that they don't partake unworthily and come under God's judgment.  Usually, before the observance of the Supper, a time of self-reflection is provided where each person is encouraged to examine his life for any sin and confess it to the Lord before continuing on in the service.  To participate in the Lord's Supper unworthily could result in sickness or even death.

My fellow Baptists who read this will be familiar with the above scenario.  Like me, they will have taken these verses very seriously.  They will have truly examined their hearts for sin before partaking, and some of them will have at times elected to not partake for fear of eating and drinking damnation to themselves.  And, like me, some of them will have questioned whether they were worthy of participating in such a sacred occasion.

I think perhaps we have misunderstood the gist of this passage.  There are two main reasons why we should reexamine our understanding of this passage.  The first reason is a lexical reason and the second is a contextual reason.  The lexical reason has to do with the way the King James Version translates the Greek word anaxiōs as simply "unworthily" in verse 27. A survey of most modern versions such as the HCSB, NASB, NIV, and ESV shows that they all translate anaxiōs as "unworthy manner" or "unworthy way", etc. This is an important difference between the KJV and the modern versions.  A consult of Strong's Concordance gives the meaning of anaxiōs as "in an unworthy manner".  Thayer's Greek Lexicon defines it the same way.  Anaxiōs is an adverb which means that it refers to the action of partaking rather than to the participant himself.  The emphasis of this verse then is not upon the worthiness or unworthiness of the person about to partake, but rather upon the manner in which he is about to partake.  After all, not one of us is worthy of one drop of Jesus' precious blood, nor one piece of His broken body.  If this verse was referring to our worthiness, then none could ever participate.  When we are called to examine ourselves in verse 29, we are not called to determine our worthiness or unworthiness.  Rather, we are called to examine our behavior towards the body of Christ.  This leads us to the contextual reason for reexamining this passage.

Sadly, as is often the case, we neglect the verses surrounding this passage and the context of the whole book of 1 Corinthians.  In verse 17, Paul says that when the Corinthians gathered together, instead of being for the better, it actually ended up being for the worse.  Why?  Because of divisions among them.

Paul addresses divisions among them in the very first chapter.  He pleads with them that they get rid of the divisions among them (1:10).  Some were calling attention to themselves by claiming to be disciples of either Paul or Peter or Apollos or even Christ Himself.  This was causing division and pride among the various factions.  Paul reminded them that the only legitimate boasting is that done about Jesus and what He has done (1:31)  Their envy and strife was a sign of spiritual immaturity and walking in the flesh (chapter 3). Their fighting among each other was so bad that they were even taking each other to court in front of ungodly judges, Christians suing other Christians because they couldn't get along (chapter 6).  Paul's exhortation was for them to lay down their rights for the sake of peace (6:7).  They are encouraged to lay down their freedom if their freedom causes another to stumble (chapter 8).  Paul says "No one should seek his own good, but the good of the other person" (10:24).

In the immediate context of chapter 11, Paul addresses the Corinthian's abuse of the love feast and Lord's Supper which followed it.  Apparently some of the Corinthians were feasting on the food before others even arrived and the rich were making the poor feel ashamed.  Some were even getting drunk during the love feast and were then entering into the observance of the Lord's Supper inebriated!

The Corinthians were treating each other with contempt, jealousy, and fighting.  They were looking out for their own rights and their own interests, even when it came to spiritual gifts.  They were acting exactly opposite of the Savior who gave His body and blood and who humbled Himself to wash fishermen's feet.  In short, they were making a mockery of the meaning behind the Lord's Supper because of the unworthy manner in which they were treating each other. Therefore Paul warns them to examine their attitudes and treatment of the body of Christ lest they make a mockery of the Savior they claimed to follow.

I hope that we have gained a better understanding of this passage.  I know that I have personally been convicted by what I have discovered.  May God help me live and act more like my Lord who gave Himself for me.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Couldn't Esau Repent?

What a terrible thing to want to repent and not be allowed to.  Why would God withhold repentance from Esau who was obviously broken in spirit?  Unfortunately for Esau, that seems to be what Hebrews 12:17 is saying.  Here’s the verse in its immediate context: Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.  For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.  Heb. 12:15-17 (KJV) You are probably familiar with the story from Genesis chapter 25.  Esau, the firstborn, returns from an exhausting day in the field and is hungry.  He asks for some of Jacob’s stew and Jacob offers to sell a bowl of stew to Esau in exchange for Esau’s birthrigh...

The Abusive Positive Confession Heresy

I was asked today whether I believed in the "power of the tongue".  The Christian who asked me this is from a charismatic background.  What she wanted to know is if I believe that we can speak negative things into existence in our lives.  Is it possible for me to create my own bad circumstances, i.e. cancer, sickness, tragedy, etc. by speaking them into existence?  She referenced the fact that God created the universe by simply speaking.  The implication is that words have power and, since we are created in God's image, our words have power also.  Since God's words can create, then we, His image-bearers, should also be able to create with our words.  We can literally speak things into existence, negative or positive.  This idea is called "positive/negative confession".  This is a heretical idea with no Scriptural support.  The Got Questions? website ( http://www.gotquestions.org/positive-confession.html ) has a good refutation of ...