Skip to main content

Obama Makes Illogical Pro-abortion Arguments

On January 22, 2016, the 43rd anniversary of the horrible Roe v. Wade decision concerning abortion in America, President Obama made a statement advocating for abortion (click here to access statement).  President Obama's statement reflects the standard talking points of pro-death abortion advocates.  Let's think through his statement line by line.

First he says Roe v. Wade "affirmed a woman's freedom to make her own choices about her body and her health."  This is the "pro-choice" argument.  The problem is that it isn't logical.  No woman in America has complete freedom of choice when it comes to her own body or her own health.  For instance, there are laws against drug abuse.  A woman doesn't have the legal right to make her own choice about her body in this instance.  The law takes that choice away.  She is not allowed to abuse drugs simply because that's what she chooses to do with her body.  A second reason that this is illogical is that there are two patients in every abortion procedure- the mother and the baby.  The mother cannot choose abortion without affecting the baby.  So while the mother has a supposed right to choose for herself, that right cannot be excercised without her making the choice for the baby as well.  This argument exhalts a woman's supposed right to unrestricted choice over every other American's ability to choose. She has far more power than the father, more power than the baby, and more power than anyone else who might advocate for the baby.  It's not just her body she's excercising control over.

Obama continues: "The decision supports the broader principle that the government should not intrude on private decisions made between a woman and her doctor."  This is also illogical. The government does intervene in some doctor/patient decisions.  For example, there are certain procedures that a doctor cannot legally perform even if the patient requests them.  There are certain drugs a patient may not legally have and a doctor may not legally prescribe.  In these instances the government is intruding and taking unfettered freedom of choice away from patients and doctors.  These restrictions are in place to prevent potential harm to the patient.  Every abortion "procedure" guarantees that one patient in the room, the baby, will suffer irreparable harm.  Why wouldn't the government have a responsibility to interfere on behalf of the defenseless child?

The president also said: "As we commemorate this day, we also redouble our commitment to protecting these constitutional rights, including protecting a woman’s access to safe, affordable health care and her right to reproductive freedom from efforts to undermine or overturn them."  This is simply rediculous.  First, Where in the Constitution is the right to safe, affordable healthcare mentioned?  Where is reproductive freedom mentioned in our Constitution?  To say that abortion is guaranteed by the Constitution is to be living in a fantasy land.  None of these things are provided for in our founding documents.  Instead, the preamble to our Constitution states that the Constitution was designed in part to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity".  How does abortion provide for "the Blessings of Liberty" to America's "Posterity", our children?  It doesn't.  Abortion is distinctly anti-Constitutional because it kills our posterity instead of blessing them with liberty.  The preamble to the Declaration of Independence says this: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."  Abortion takes away the inalienable fundamental rights of a baby to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."  These rights can only be enjoyed by the living. The Declaration's preamble further states that the reason for government to exist is to secure these rights, i.e. "life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness" for all citizens.  So instead of Obama using the government to promote abortion, he should see it as his Constitutional duty to do the opposite, i.e. secure the rights of our least vulnerable citizens, the unborn.

Obama's speech closes with these words: "In America, every single one of us deserves the rights, freedoms, and opportunities to fulfill our dreams."  I agree.  But abortion advocates apply a double standard here.  In their minds the only citizens in America who truly deserve rights, freedoms, and opportunities to pursue their dreams are pro-abortion women.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Couldn't Esau Repent?

What a terrible thing to want to repent and not be allowed to.  Why would God withhold repentance from Esau who was obviously broken in spirit?  Unfortunately for Esau, that seems to be what Hebrews 12:17 is saying.  Here’s the verse in its immediate context: Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.  For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.  Heb. 12:15-17 (KJV) You are probably familiar with the story from Genesis chapter 25.  Esau, the firstborn, returns from an exhausting day in the field and is hungry.  He asks for some of Jacob’s stew and Jacob offers to sell a bowl of stew to Esau in exchange for Esau’s birthrigh...

The Lord's Supper and Eating Unworthily

By far the most popular passage in Baptist churches concerning observing the Lord's Supper is 1 Corinthians 11:17-34.  A particular focus has been placed on verses 27-31 quoted below from the King James Version that many of us grew up with. 27  Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28  But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. 29  For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. 30  For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. 31  For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. (1 Cor. 11:27-31 KJV) photo courtesy of www.freeimages.com Pastors often point to these verses as a warning to would be participants in the ordinance that they should first examine themselves so that they don't partake unworthily ...

Justification

Job asked, " ...how can a person be justified before God? " Job 9:2 (HCSB) .  Could there be any question of greater importance?  I'm a champion at justifying myself by comparing myself to others.  How many times have I said, "I'm not perfect but at least I don't act like so-and-so!"  But God doesn't compare my righteousness with that of others, He compares it to His own.  The Bible says that it is God to whom I must one day give an account.   Hebrews 4:13   So the question is not "Am I more righteous than my neighbor?" but rather "How can I be righteous enough for God?" The Bible clearly says that I am a sinner and in need of righteousness.   Rom. 3:23   Rom. 3:10   Furthermore, God is holy and has no fellowship with sinners.  The Bible describes this holiness as being like light and sin being like darkness. Now this is the message we have heard from Him and declare to you: God is light,   and there is absolutely no d...