Skip to main content

The Irrelevancy of the Born Gay Argument

For many years there has been a proposition made that some people are born gay and others born straight. This is a difficult argument to settle since it is almost impossible to prove true or false.  That is why I believe that it has been used so successfully by those who support homosexuality as a legitimate lifestyle.  If some people are born gay, then they are presumably not culpable for their homosexuality.  In fact, as they pursue their homosexuality and act upon it in relationship with another, they are only doing what God designed them to do.  Who can blame them for that?  If God designed some gay and some straight from birth, then homosexuality is just as legitimate as heterosexuality.  Indeed, if anyone is to blame, it is God Himself.

My contention is that the debate over whether one is a born homosexual or not is irrelevant.  Suppose that it could be substantiated scientifically that there is indeed a "gay gene".  If, through genetic testing, it was discovered that I had inherited an inclination towards same-sex attraction, would this be God's sanctioning of my participation in homosexual sex?  If I just do what comes naturally to me, isn't that a good enough rule to live by?  Who has the right to tell me that I cannot act upon my natural instincts?

I believe that there are some people who are born with a tendency towards homosexuality.  Same-sex attraction is indeed an inherited trait.  Like all other deviant sexual desires, the desire for homosexuality is inherited from mankind's progenitor- Adam. "Gay-ness" is not a matter of cell chemistry, or the physical properties of a person's genetic makeup. Homosexuality, as with all sin, springs from a spiritual sin nature. God is not to blame. He didn't design anyone with a sin nature. We owe that to Adam.  He was the one who became a sinner because he refused to live within the boundaries that God set for him. As his descendants, we have all inherited his sin nature.  And like our father, we balk at God's right to put boundaries around our sexual choices.

What makes homosexuality right or wrong has nothing to do with what tendencies we were born with. Doing what comes naturally is not the rule of life.  What is the standard that determines whether my sexual conduct is right or wrong? What rule should I conduct my life by?  The Scripture is clear that the standard of morality is not what seems good to me, but rather that which is in submission to the boundaries of God, the rule maker.  I cannot use the "doing what comes naturally" excuse if I were to steal, or to murder, or to abuse another person.  Neither can I use it when I choose to act sexually outside of God's rules for my life.  In every area of our lives we are told to submit to God's will, not to our own wills.  The problem is that we have inherited sin natures that are constantly at war with God's will for us. Therefore, if we are to ever be free from slavery to fulfilling the lusts of our sin natures, we must be born again and receive a new nature from a new Father- this time not born in accordance to the corrupt human nature of Adam, but born from above by the Spirit of God.

This new birth takes place when we turn to God by placing our trust in Jesus Christ as our Savior.  He died to free us from the penalty and power of sin and to give us His righteousness.  The one who places his trust in Jesus as his Savior is given the gift of new birth from God.  The Holy Spirit comes to live inside the believer and gives the believer a new nature with new desires.  He also empowers the believer to follow God's will, even if the old sin nature's will is contrary to that of God's.

Homosexuality is not the only sexual sin.  God has determined that any sexual practice that is not between one man and one woman, united in a marriage relationship, is wrong.  We do not have the luxury of making our own rules or following our own hearts in the matter.  We are accountable to God to live within the boundaries He has set.  Therefore, the "born gay" argument is irrelevant.  

Popular posts from this blog

The Lord's Supper and Eating Unworthily

By far the most popular passage in Baptist churches concerning observing the Lord's Supper is 1 Corinthians 11:17-34.  A particular focus has been placed on verses 27-31 quoted below from the King James Version that many of us grew up with. 27  Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28  But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. 29  For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. 30  For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. 31  For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. (1 Cor. 11:27-31 KJV) photo courtesy of www.freeimages.com Pastors often point to these verses as a warning to would be participants in the ordinance that they should first examine themselves so that they don't partake unworthily and come under Go

Why Couldn't Esau Repent?

What a terrible thing to want to repent and not be allowed to.  Why would God withhold repentance from Esau who was obviously broken in spirit?  Unfortunately for Esau, that seems to be what Hebrews 12:17 is saying.  Here’s the verse in its immediate context: Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.  For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.  Heb. 12:15-17 (KJV) You are probably familiar with the story from Genesis chapter 25.  Esau, the firstborn, returns from an exhausting day in the field and is hungry.  He asks for some of Jacob’s stew and Jacob offers to sell a bowl of stew to Esau in exchange for Esau’s birthright.  Esau foolishly agrees and sell

The Abusive Positive Confession Heresy

I was asked today whether I believed in the "power of the tongue".  The Christian who asked me this is from a charismatic background.  What she wanted to know is if I believe that we can speak negative things into existence in our lives.  Is it possible for me to create my own bad circumstances, i.e. cancer, sickness, tragedy, etc. by speaking them into existence?  She referenced the fact that God created the universe by simply speaking.  The implication is that words have power and, since we are created in God's image, our words have power also.  Since God's words can create, then we, His image-bearers, should also be able to create with our words.  We can literally speak things into existence, negative or positive.  This idea is called "positive/negative confession".  This is a heretical idea with no Scriptural support.  The Got Questions? website ( http://www.gotquestions.org/positive-confession.html ) has a good refutation of the positive confession he