Skip to main content

The Vatican is Guilty of Torturing Abortion-seeking Women?

© Pictures of Rome courtesy of  www.rome.info

Torture is a pretty serious charge.  Do you remember how the left, during the George W. Bush presidency, slandered our military and CIA by accusing them of torturing captives?  Well, they're at it again.  This time the charge is leveled against the Catholic church, and her supposed victims are abortion-seeking women.

One may ask, By what heinous methods are these women being tortured?  Water-boarding?  Loud music blared in their eardrums?  Iron maidens or other medieval torture machinery?  The answer is none of the above.  Instead, the Vatican is guilty of employing a torture device so wicked, so sinister, so diabolically sadistic that none other than the United Nations Committee Against Torture has involved itself in a valiant effort to stop the Vatican from using it against future victims. Apparently, the UN won't sleep until it reaches its goal; a universal ban of the Catholic torture device. After all, it's the only way to ensure the welfare of humanity and make the world a safer place for all women who want to kill their babies.  The method chosen by the Vatican to torture and inflict great pain upon women is not a machine after all.  Instead, it is the Catholic church's stance that abortion is wrong.

Apparently, millions of women who wish to abort the life within them are being psychologically tortured because the Vatican uncompromisingly voices a pro-life message.  A pro-abortion advocacy group called the Center for Reproductive Rights has convinced the UN Committee Against Torture to put pressure on the Vatican to silence its pro-life message, equating such pro-life speech with torture.  Their claim is that the pro-life message is a form of psychological torture upon women who seek abortions.  You can read about it here.  You can also find more information from the American Center for Law and Justice.

I bet you can already guess what I'm thinking.  I'm thinking that the "torture" word is being directed towards the wrong party.  It defies belief that the pro-abortion advocates could actually equate pro-life speech with torture.  What about the aborted baby who is either burned to death with acid or stabbed to death and dismembered?  Who is crying torture about his plight?  In the guise of human rights, the pro-abortion crowd is guilty of advocating for actual human torture all the while pointing blood-soaked fingers at the Vatican for imaginary psychological torture.

The attempt to place the blame for the guilt caused by abortion on the pro-life message is ludicrous.  This is seen in the related story of Emily Letts.  Ms. Letts, a pro-abortion activist, recently produced a video of herself having a surgical abortion.  In an interview with Philadelphia Magazine, Letts referred to her video and stated, "Women and men have been thirsting for something like this.  You don't have to feel guilty." Letts blames the guilt women feel about abortion, not upon the fact that abortion is the killing of a baby, but rather upon society's lack of empathy for abortive women.  You can read this disturbing article here.  I also highly recommend that you read Dr. Albert Mohler's article on Letts.

As much as abortion advocates would like to place the blame on others, the reality is that women who participate in abortion are guilty of murder and thereby experience psychological distress. Self-inflicted psychological torture is created when a woman goes against God's authority, her conscience, and natural mothering instincts and follows through with an abortion. A guilty conscience that is stirred when someone attempts to cause you to rethink murdering your baby is not torture; it's God's gift to you to keep you from doing wrong.

Let me know what you think about this post in the comments section below.  

Articles Cited:
Paul Bedard, "U.N. calls Vatican's anti-abortion canon 'psychological torture' of women," Washington Examiner, Monday, May 5, 2014
http://washingtonexaminer.com/u.n.-calls-vaticans-anti-abortion-canon-psychological-torture-of-women/article/2548061

Victor Fiorillo, "Q&A: Actress Emily Letts on the Reaction to Her Abortion Video," Philadelphia Magazine, Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Albert Mohler, "'I Feel Super Great About Having an Abortion'-The Culture of Death Goes Viral," Albert Mohler.com, Thursday, May 8, 2014


Popular posts from this blog

The Lord's Supper and Eating Unworthily

By far the most popular passage in Baptist churches concerning observing the Lord's Supper is 1 Corinthians 11:17-34.  A particular focus has been placed on verses 27-31 quoted below from the King James Version that many of us grew up with. 27  Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28  But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. 29  For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. 30  For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. 31  For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. (1 Cor. 11:27-31 KJV) photo courtesy of www.freeimages.com Pastors often point to these verses as a warning to would be participants in the ordinance that they should first examine themselves so that they don't partake unworthily ...
Read more

Why Couldn't Esau Repent?

What a terrible thing to want to repent and not be allowed to.  Why would God withhold repentance from Esau who was obviously broken in spirit?  Unfortunately for Esau, that seems to be what Hebrews 12:17 is saying.  Here’s the verse in its immediate context: Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.  For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.  Heb. 12:15-17 (KJV) You are probably familiar with the story from Genesis chapter 25.  Esau, the firstborn, returns from an exhausting day in the field and is hungry.  He asks for some of Jacob’s stew and Jacob offers to sell a bowl of stew to Esau in exchange for Esau’s birthrigh...
Read more

The Abusive Positive Confession Heresy

I was asked today whether I believed in the "power of the tongue".  The Christian who asked me this is from a charismatic background.  What she wanted to know is if I believe that we can speak negative things into existence in our lives.  Is it possible for me to create my own bad circumstances, i.e. cancer, sickness, tragedy, etc. by speaking them into existence?  She referenced the fact that God created the universe by simply speaking.  The implication is that words have power and, since we are created in God's image, our words have power also.  Since God's words can create, then we, His image-bearers, should also be able to create with our words.  We can literally speak things into existence, negative or positive.  This idea is called "positive/negative confession".  This is a heretical idea with no Scriptural support.  The Got Questions? website ( http://www.gotquestions.org/positive-confession.html ) has a good refutation of ...
Read more