Skip to main content

Isaac Asimov's book "In the Beginning": Part Three- Chapter 2

In my last post I attempted to show how Asimov, although an atheist, understood that the Biblical text of Genesis chapter one clearly teaches a young earth and six, literal, 24-hour days.  I introduced the fact that Asimov believed the J.E.P.D. theory that denies that Moses wrote Genesis.  According to this fraudulent theory, multiple hypothetical writers and editors took multiple hypothetical accounts of origins and combined them into what we know as Genesis and the other books of the Pentateuch.  Asimov thought that the writer of the P document gave us Genesis 1:1-2:4a, and the rest of Genesis two was written by the author of the J document.  I won't waste time wading through all of the useless speculations and groundless proclamations that Asimov presents in chapter two of his book.  My treatment of this chapter will be to present just a few observations.

In explaining Genesis 2:17, where God prohibits eating from the tree of knowledge, he says this:
"Eating the fruit may kill the man spiritually, destroying his innocence and filling him with sin.  Or else eating the fruit may simply make him mortal.  He may not be dead at the moment of eating, but he will know from that moment that it will be inevitable that someday he will die."[1] 

Although he presents the consequences of disobeying God's command as a false either/or statement, at least Asimov arrives at the proper two aspects of Biblical death.  The correct Biblical understanding is a combination of the two options that he mentions.  The Bible presents both spiritual death and physical death as the wages of sin.

Asimov continues:
"The implication is that if the man were to refrain from eating the fruit, he would never die but would be immortal.  This, of course, has no basis in fact as far as the scientific study of the history of humanity is concerned.  There never was a time when human beings were immortal or when any multicellular creature was."[2]
This comment is worthy of discussion.  Asimov makes an unfounded, untestable, blanket statement.  Let me explain.  In order for a scientist to positively prove that there never was a time when human beings or other creatures were immortal, that scientist would have had to have lived throughout all of history, and in every place in the universe simultaneously, and would have had to been able to observe all life, from the largest animals to the smallest multicellular creatures, all at the same time and be infallible in all of his observations.   In other words, that scientist would have to be a god.

Of course, there is someone who has lived throughout all of history, in every place in the universe simultaneously, and is able to observe all life, from the largest to the smallest, all at the same time, and is infallible in all of his observations. That person is the God of the Bible.  He wrote down for us His eyewitness account of the time when humans and all animals were indeed immortal; the time between the completion of His perfect creation until Adam and Eve broke His command and introduced sin and death into the world.

One final thought.  In addition to knowing what happened in the beginning, God even knows the future.  He says that there is another perfect world awaiting all of those who trust in the death of His Son, Jesus, to pay for the punishment that they deserve because of their own disobedience to God.
“For God loved the world in this way: He gave His One and Only Son, so that everyone who believes in Him will not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send His Son into the world that He might condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. Anyone who believes in Him is not condemned, but anyone who does not believe is already condemned, because he has not believed in the name of the One and Only Son of God." John 3:16-18 (HCSB)
In my next post I will discuss Asimov's chapter three.

NOTES:
[1] Isaac Asimov, In the Beginning... (New York: Crown Publishers, Inc., 1981), 94-95.
[2] Ibid., 95.

Popular posts from this blog

The Abusive Positive Confession Heresy

I was asked today whether I believed in the "power of the tongue".  The Christian who asked me this is from a charismatic background.  What she wanted to know is if I believe that we can speak negative things into existence in our lives.  Is it possible for me to create my own bad circumstances, i.e. cancer, sickness, tragedy, etc. by speaking them into existence?  She referenced the fact that God created the universe by simply speaking.  The implication is that words have power and, since we are created in God's image, our words have power also.  Since God's words can create, then we, His image-bearers, should also be able to create with our words.  We can literally speak things into existence, negative or positive.  This idea is called "positive/negative confession".  This is a heretical idea with no Scriptural support.  The Got Questions? website ( http://www.gotquestions.org/positive-confession.html ) has a good refutation of ...

Will Artificial Intelligence Destroy Mankind? Stephen Hawking Thinks It Could Happen

courtesy of freeimages.com A recent Fox news article ( read article here ) reported that physicist Stephen Hawking is worried about the development of artificial intelligence, or AI for short. [1]   Hawking is apparently worried that if advances in AI continue the human race could one day become extinct.  He is quoted as saying, "The development of full artificial intelligence (AI) could spell the end of the human race."    The article also quotes Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla Motors.  Musk is said to have told an audience at MIT that we need to be "very careful" with artificial intelligence.  Fox reports that Musk "called for national and international oversight of the field". The idea of machines becoming more advanced than humans is great science fiction.  It is fun and somewhat scary to contemplate the ramifications of machines being able to think for themselves.  But will AI be the end of mankind?  Not if you believe Bib...

A Personal Testimony

I grew up in a loving home with Christian parents and Christian siblings (an older brother and sister). My dad felt God's call on his life to become a pastor before I even started school so I have been a preacher's kid for practically all of my life.  Yeah, I'm that kid.  The one that got to go on the youth group snow skiing trip before I was in the youth group because I got to tag along with my pastor/dad. I have heard a lot of stories of preacher's kids (pk's) who are bitter about their experiences; the perceived constant scrutiny from church members, the lack of privacy, having to share their dad with hundreds of other people, missing out on family vacations because someone's aunt so-and-so died, etc. Those are real experiences, but I consider it a privilege to have the example of a godly dad who gave himself to minister to others as their pastor.  The blessings of being a pk far outweigh the challenges in my opinion. When I was around five years old, my ni...